NSGIC News

This blog has moved

noreply@blogger.com (Mike Mahaffie) — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:31:00 +0000

This blog is now located at http://news.nsgic.org/.
You will be automatically redirected in 30 seconds, or you may click here.

For feed subscribers, please update your feed subscriptions to
http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheNsgicBlog.

NSGIC Member, and Some Friends, Found Among GovTech's "Top 25"

noreply@blogger.com (Mike Mahaffie) — Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:58:00 +0000

Long time NSGIC member Eric Swanson (Michigan) is among the Top 25 Doers, Dreamers and Drivers for 2010 selected by the editors of Government Technology magazine. Each march, the magazine fociuses on 25 people who"cut through the public sector's infamous barriers to innovation -- tight budgets, organizational inertia, politics as usual, etc. -- to reshape government operations for the better."

Eric Swanson is noted for his work at Michigan's Center for Shared Solutions and Technology Partnerships.

The center's mission is "to transform government with IT being the catalyst, fostering collaboration across government lines," and Swanson and his team have worked hard to make that possible over the years.

Among the rest of the Top 25 are a number of friends of NSGIC and state and local technology leaders who have helped state GIS coordination along the way. They include:

Utah CTO David Fletcher -- According to Bert Granberg, and Matt Peters, of Utah, Mr. Fletcher is "a great champion of GIS and is very supportive of AGRC." They add that he is working on location based services for state and local government in Utahand has spearheaded the drive for a data.utah.gov portal.
Virginia deputy secretary of technology Karen Jackson -- Virginia's Dan Widner reports that Ms. Jackson is leading the charge on Broadband in Virginia and is doing some great behind the scenes work with the industry and the feds on “connectivity” issues.
Colorado CIO Mike Locatis -- I thought I must have met Mr. Locatis at some point, but itr turns out that I have simply heard him mentioned whenever Jon Gottsegen speaks about success at GIS Coordination in Colorado. Thet wo apparently have worked closely together.
Beth Noveck, of the Obama Administration, is well-known among the NSGIC community for her spearheading of government transparency initiatives.
Maryland secretary of the Department of Information Technology Elliot Schlanger -- He developed CityStat when Maryland Governor Martin O'Malley was Mayor of Baltimore. When O'Malley brought him up to the state level he created StateStat and made Maryland GIS Coordinator Kenny Miller a very busy man.

Digital Coast Update

noreply@blogger.com (Mike Mahaffie) — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:40:00 +0000

The following is a guest post from Tim De Troy (SC) and Bill Burgess (Washington Liaison) who represent NSGIC in the Digital Coast Partnership. The Digital Coast Partnership, led by the NOAA Coastal Services Center, is intended to be an information delivery system to efficiently serve not only data, but also the training, tools, and examples needed to turn data into useful information for the coastal states.

The Coastal Inundation Toolkit
The Coastal Inundation Toolkit has continued to evolve with many new materials provided by the partners. In addition, County Snapshots are now complete for the continental United States and Hawaii. But please note that some counties are missing. The data does not exist for these counties and it may be quite some time before the missing counties are included.

One example of a new resource in the Toolkit is an issue brief from the National Association of Counties (NACO) — Building Resilient Coastal Communities: Counties and the Digital Coast (PDF). Other members of the Partnership, such as The Nature Conservancy (TNC) and the Association of State Flood Plain Managers (ASFPM) have also added new materials to the Toolkit.

Land Cover Atlas
A great new land cover tool has been released. It is the C-CAP Land Cover Atlas. When you launch the viewer, it allows you to go to any coastal county to see how land cover has changed over time between the identified classes. It also allows you to obtain a written report of the changes by clicking on the “Stats and Downloads” tab next to the image area. With a little practice, we’re sure your coastal managers will find this to be a very valuable tool.

Training Opportunities

Habitat Priority Planner Web Demonstrations — The Habitat Priority Planner is a GIS-based decision support tool that helps to identify priority locations for conservation and restoration planning. Web demonstrations that highlight the tool’s functionality are offered on the last Monday of each month. To sign up, send an e-mail to nos.csc.hpp@noaa.gov.
CanVis Virtual Workshops — CanVis is a visual simulation tool that enables users to add objects to images in order to visualize impacts of future management decisions. Virtual workshops are offered the third Wednesday of each month. The workshops provide an introduction to CanVis with hands-on activities. Register by e-mailing nos.csc.canvis@noaa.gov.
Introduction to N-SPECT Training — Land use professionals use the Nonpoint-Source Pollution and Erosion Comparison Tool (N-SPECT) to investigate potential water quality impacts from land use and land cover changes, including development, and from environmental disturbances such as storms and climate change. The hands-on GIS-based workshop will cover how N-SPECT is commonly used, relay helpful tips, and give participants the opportunity to ask questions. Advance registration is required as seating is limited. Visit the N-SPECT training page to learn more. The next session is scheduled for April 15, 2010.

Editor’s Note: In addition, we are told that there is a planned Digital Coast session at the 2010 National Planning Conference (April 10 – 13, in New Orleans). All of the members of the Partnership will be represented. And Miki Schmidt of the Coastal Services Center will be a featured Keynote Speaker at the 2010 Delaware GIS Conference, March 30, in Dover, Delaware.

A New Face on the NSGIC Board of Directors

noreply@blogger.com (Mike Mahaffie) — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:32:00 +0000

Ian Von Essen, of the state of Washington, is now a member of the NSGIC Board of Directors. He was Appointed by NSGIC President Will Craig and approved by the Board at their February 23, 2010, meeting to complete the term of California's Michael Byrne, who has stepped down to take a job in Washington DC.

Mr. Von Essen, who is on the Washington Geographic Information Council (WAGIC), works for Spokane County and brings a fine balance of local and state government viewpoints that will add to the mix in NSGIC Board discussions. He currently serves as Chair-Elect for WAGIC and will become that group's Chair in June of this year. This will be his fifth term as WAGIC Chair since 2000.

The NSGIC Board term that Mr. Von Essen has been appointed to ends this fall when the seat is up for re-election at the 2010 NSGIC Annual Conference, in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

USGS cut will cause the states to bleed

noreply@blogger.com (Will Craig) — Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:00:00 +0000

The President's budget for USGS proposes a $3.5 million cut in the National Geospatial Program. This cut means the loss of 13 state liaisons. With some liaison serving more than one state, this could affect one-third of the states.

"The USGS liaisons have provided the best single conduit for partnerships between the states and the Federal government," said NSGIC President Will Craig in a letter to the leaders of the House Appropriations Subcommittee that will be the first to review the President's budget.

The budget cut will also reduce federal partnership dollars that have leveraged significant investment in state and local data development projects. Craig went on to say, "If anything, we request that Congress significantly increase these partnership dollars, not cut them."

Craig is urging NSGIC members and friends to contact their Members of Congress, especially in the House and Senate Appropriations Committees. "Tell them about the value of the USGS liaisons and partnership funds. States need these resources."

Full details are in the FY2011 USGS Greenbook, page I-29.

Final Midyear Agenda Posted to NSGIC Website

git@socket.net (Tony) — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:01:00 +0000

The latest agenda for the Midyear meeting has been posted to NSGIC 2010 Midyear web page. Although there may be last minute changes, this agenda is finalized at this time.

Registration for the Midyear remains open. Please visit the NSGIC website to download a copy of the registration brochure or access the online registration page.

NSGIC 2010 Midyear Conference - HOTEL DEADLINE EXTENDED - RESERVE TODAY!

git@socket.net (Tony) — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:10:00 +0000

NSGIC Members,

We’ve been able to get an extension on the cut-off date at the Loews Annapolis Hotel! The hotel will continue to offer the NSGIC discounted rate of $120 per night until Wednesday, February 24th. This is the approved Federal Government Per Diem rate. Don’t wait to make your reservations. Call the hotel directly at (410) 263-7777 to make your reservation and be sure to ask for the NSGIC group rate. Be sure to call before February 22nd, as this rate will NOT be available after that date.

Registration for the 2010 Midyear Conference is available. Please visit the NSGIC website (http://www.nsgic.org/events/2010_midyear.cfm) to download a copy of the registration brochure or access the online registration page.

As always, please don’t hesitate to contact me if you should need any additional information. I’m looking forward to seeing all of you in Annapolis!

Tony Spicci
Tony.Spicci@mdc.mo.gov
573.882.9909 ext 3295

VGI Workshop Results

noreply@blogger.com (Will Craig) — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 22:18:00 +0000

A workshop on Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) was held in Herndon VA, January 12-13. The workshop was sponsored by USGS with a goal of exploring the potential use of VGI as part of The National Map.

Some fascinating presentations were made by people who use VGI for gathering and sharing information: folks from Open Street Map, Wikimedia, and the Library of Congress. Their Point Presentations and notes from the meeting are now available as part of the Workshop Results.

Will Craig, NSGIC president, attended the conference and facilitated the breakout section on Business Perspectives - what does it take to organize and administer a VGI? He comments on the workshop:

I was fascinated by the energy in the room. Many folks were eager to get started NOW. "Jump in with both feet. People will forgive you if you make a mistake. Seize the day." Others worried about costs, administrative issues, and losing credibility.

Unfortunately a presentation by Muki Haklay, University College London, is not among the PPTs. He analyzed VGI quality compared to the Ordnance Survey authoritative street maps and found very high levels of alignment.

Local governments and states have geographic information they'd like to volunteer to The National Map. That is the real vision of the NSDI. NSGIC would love to see procedures in place to accept our VGI.

Update (2/15/10): Haklay's work comparing Open Street Maps to Ordnance Survey Maps can be found on-line (courtesy Adena Schutzberg, Directions Magazine)

His blog:
  http://povesham.wordpress.com/
Comparison pt 1:
  http://povesham.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/osm-quality-evaluation/
Comparison pt 2:
 http://povesham.wordpress.com/2009/11/14/openstreetmap-and-ordnance-survey-meridian-2-progress-maps/

URISA Delivers Draft Address Standard to FGDC

noreply@blogger.com (Mike Mahaffie) — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 21:26:00 +0000

The Board of Directors of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association (URISA) has sent a draft address standard -- more properly the United States Thoroughfare, Landmark, and Postal Address Data Standard -- to the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) for review and comment.

This draft is the result of five years of work by the URISA Address Standard Working Group (ASWG), an effort that has been watched and supported by many in NSGIC and the larger GIS community, including NSGIC President Will Craig, of Minnesota, who helped lead a NSGIC Address Work Group. The need for national address data is part of the current NSGIC Advocacy Agenda (PDF).

Will Craig notes that Ed Wells, from URISA, was a member of the NSGIC working group and was a leader in developing the draft standard.

We early-on recognized that it would be hard open the Census Bureau's Master Address File (MAF) for public use to fulfill our need for a nation-wide address resource. Title 13 of the US Code and Census Bureau sensitivities would require an act of Congress to overcome. If we are going to have a nation-wide address resource, it will be build from the ground up by cities and counties.

To make it work nation-wide, we need this standard. I am delighted to see it delivered to the FGDC for formal review. I trust the review will be quick and thorough. We need this now.

Data Sharing Issues: What Works and What Doesn’t

noreply@blogger.com (Mike Mahaffie) — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:07:00 +0000

The following is a guest-post from national metadata advocate Lynda Wayne. In January, she put out a request to the NSGIC Community for input on her project to document "a set of practical measures to encourage/facilitate data sharing." This was part of an effort to assist to Dr. Tim De Troye and the Geospatial Administrators Association of South Carolina (GAASC) in developing the Process Framework for Developing Local Government Data Access Policies document (shared by Tim on this blog in January) and to add some "real world" content to a follow-up SC GIS conference presentation and discussion. Here is what she found out.

Issue: Variable Data Sharing Agreements
Data sharing agreements vary greatly in their complexity, effectiveness and requirements. When trying to share data among multiple organizations, managing differences and conflicts among agreements can be overwhelming.

What works:

Handshakes making share Admin is on board
Collaboratively developed, effective, standardized data sharing agreements

What doesn’t:

Formal agreements because they typically include imprecise language that can serve as road blocks and add unnecessary overhead to the effort
Over-involvement on the part of Administration and Legal personnel that leads to overly burdensome language in an effort to cover all the bases and possible scenarios

Issue: Missing or Out of Date Data Documentation
If data are not well-documented then they cannot be applied as fully or appropriately and competing/conflicting data sets can emerge.

What works:

Providing metadata creation, review and management support in return for data access
Support for a community-wide metadata training and support organization/resource

What doesn’t:

Trying to create metadata by guessing at how the data were created

Issue: Maintaining Personal Privacy and Public Safety
Data developers have an obligation to protect the privacy and safety of their constituents.

What works:

Utilizing the FGDC Guidelines (PDF) as to what data should be shared
Utilize available standards (e.g. URISA/FGDC Addressing standard) that address privacy and security issues
Generalizing data such that non-sensitive content is still available
Public Record Laws and ‘policies from above’ that explicitly include geospatial data and establish clear guidelines as to who can access the data and how to request access
Recognizing that very little data is truly ‘sensitive’

What doesn’t:

Wholesale approaches that eliminate sharing of all ‘potentially’ sensitive data
Over-involvement on the part of Administration and Legal personnel that attempt to cover all the bases

Issue: Maintaining Control of the Data
Data, like any resources, is subject to personal, professional and/or political control issues.

What works:

Earnest dialog to identify precise concerns and brainstorm on innovative solutions
Naming conventions and data lineage guidelines such as those published by the Louisiana Data Council (PDF)
Data management models that allow the use of data that is maintained in your system
Data steward / trusted source models

What doesn’t:

Treating public data as a private resource

Issue: Data Misuse and Exploitation
Once data is in the hands of others in can be inappropriately applied or resold for profit.
What works:

Metadata, metadata, metadata that includes valid ‘Use Constraints’, ‘Distribution Liability’ and ‘Purpose’ statements
Clear, not ‘legalese’, explanation of license/copyright requirements and mandatory acknowledgement by the consumer
Making data freely accessible so that consumers easily use current version rather than trying to milk the older data

What doesn’t:

Stifling the use of data in new and innovative ways – if somebody makes a product somebody else is willing to pay for that drives the economy and enterprise.

Issue: Reduced Capacity and Infrastructure to Support Data Serving and Exchange
Most organizations have a mission to serve their own constituents and are staffed/resourced specifically to that mission.

What works:

Money - especially if designated to build and maintain data sharing capacity – new data collection, hardware, software, training
A simplified process that adds no burden to the data provider
Documenting the return on investment that data sharing can yield to warrant capacity building

What doesn’t:

One time payments for data that are not targeted to capacity growth

What say you, gentle readers? Feel free to add any thoughts in the comments section.

NSGIC Strategic Plan: A Midstream Review

noreply@blogger.com (Mike Mahaffie) — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:26:00 +0000

NSGIC is making progress on the goals set out in its 2009 - 2011 Strategic Plan. An updated version of the plan (PDF) has been posted on the NSGIC web site. It includes the findings of a team tasked by the NSGIC Board to review the plan and measure progress, so far, on all 23 goals in the plan.

The group used a 4-point scoring criteria, ranging from 0, for goals which are no longer relevant and that the group felt should be dropped, to 3, for goals that have been met.

Three of the goals were judged to be no longer relevant. Four others were found to have limited progress, so far. Of the remaining 16 goals, good progress was found on nine and seven others have already been met.

"Over two-thirds of the goals are met or are progressing well," writes NSGIC President Will Craig, of Minnesota, in a cover letter. "Adjusting for the three goals the team recommended dropping, the level of good progress amounts to 80 percent."

But, he added, "That still leaves significant work to be done."

The review was officially adopted by the Board at its November 24, 2009 meeting.

"My God... It's Full of Metadata!"

noreply@blogger.com (Mike Mahaffie) — Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:34:00 +0000

The following is stolen shamelessly from an e-mail from USGS Metadata Guru Sharon Shin, who gives credit to National Metadata Champion Lynda Wayne (and family): Metadata in the Movies!

It seems Lynda and her family watched the movie Beyond a Reasonable Doubt the other day and, as Sharon puts it, "there is a scene that made her sit up straight – two very nerdy guys discuss metadata and image pattern recognition."

It's more than that. The scene has a small sample of dialogue that all (conscientious) GIS pros have found themselves reciting at some point, though not in a major motion picture and not (at least for me, so far) in the service of solving crimes.

By the way, if you plan to watch this film sometime, don't watch this clip. It contains a spoiler.

For those who heeded the spoiler alert:

Nerdy Computer Guy 1: (Cheery) They're uncompressed. 24 Megs. That's good.

Attractive Movie Star Type Lady: (Vaguely interested) Why is that good?

Nerdy Computer Guy 2: (Like... duh!) More resolution -- more metadata.

AMSTL: (Puzzled) Metadata?

NCG2: (Deeply disappointed) She doesn't know what metadata is...

NCG1: (Catty, to NCG2) She knows lots of stuff that you don't know.

NCG1: (Helpfully, to AMSTL) Metadata is literally data about data...

And then it gets into details about this particular crime and the plot of the movie.

But that little bit there? Goodness how familiar that sounded.

Show us the Stimulus

noreply@blogger.com (Will Craig) — Tue, 02 Feb 2010 03:50:00 +0000

Government is under pressure to show where stimulus dollars are being spent. A new report rates state websites on how well they show the distribution of funds within their borders. Maps play a critical part in this.

Good Jobs First, a non-profit research center based in Washington, DC, has just published Show Us the Stimulus (Again), an update of a similar report last July. It shows great improvements in the states’ ability to document where the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) dollars are being spent. Some $200 billion dollars are flowing through the states.

The report ranks the states on their ability to show where the money is going. Scores range from 5-87 on a 100 point scale. GIS and mapping contribute greatly to the ability of states to score well in this review. Maryland is rated #1. Three of the seven rating criteria are based on geography:

Map the distribution of funding at the county level or equivalent.
Compare that distribution with patterns of economic distress.
Map individual projects

The Good Jobs First website includes the report, appendices rating the individual state efforts, and links to the state websites. See Show Us the Stimulus: An Evaluation of State Government Recovery Act Websites

URISA Seeks Nominations for GIS Hall of Fame

noreply@blogger.com (Mike Mahaffie) — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:57:00 +0000

URISA (the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association) is looking for nominations for the 2010 class of inductees to its GIS Hall of Fame which "recognizes and honors the best in GIS."

Nominations are open to persons in any profession and are not limited to those with relationships with URISA. The selection criteria are listed on the URISA web site:

At least 25 years of sustained professional involvement in the GIS field.
Original and creative contributions to the field.
Well known and respected by a wide range of peers.
Consistent demonstration of sound professional and personal ethics.

The Hall of Fame, created by URISA in 2005, includes, among its inductees, current NSGIC president Will Craig.

Nominations for the 2010 class are due to URISA by May 1, 2010.

Welcome Texas to the Ranks of State GIS Coordination Blogs

noreply@blogger.com (Mike Mahaffie) — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:42:00 +0000

The great (big) state of Texas now has a GIS coordination blog.The fine folks at the Texas Natural Resources Information System (TNRIS) have started a new TNRIS blog to help keep track of what's going on in Texas' GIS community.

To better keep our users informed about all TNRIS activities, we are very pleased to announce that we will now be blogging about all our activities and sharing some of the behind-the-scenes information that may be beneficial to you. We also highly encourage your comments on any of our posts and we will use them in a very constructive manner.

The TNRIS Blog uses Posterous, a blogging system described by its founders as "the dead simple way to put anything online using email."

It joins a growing list of gis coordination blogs among many NSGIC members.

Resources: An NSDI Collection

noreply@blogger.com (Mike Mahaffie) — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:56:00 +0000

The Geodata Policy Blog has started a great list of links to articles, reports and editorials on the discussion around the building of as National Spatial Data Infrastructure for the United States.

The list includes:

National Geospatial Advisory Council Reports,
2009 Proposals for a “National GIS,”
Congressional Hearing Archives,
Related Commentary, and
related documents

And it may grow. It is, if nothing else, certainly worth a bookmark.

South Carolina Publishes a Guide to Developing Data Access Policies

noreply@blogger.com (Mike Mahaffie) — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:00:00 +0000

Editor's Note: The following is a guest-post from Dr. Timothy M. De Troye, GISP, South Carolina State GIS Coordinator and member of the NSGIC Board of Directors.

The Geospatial Administrators Association of South Carolina has published a guide to help local governments, as well as all other levels of government and the private sector, develop and implement GIS data access policies.

The guide -- A Process Framework for Developing Local Government Data Access Policies (PDF) -- grew out of discussions at the 2009 South Carolina statewide GIS conference. An informal poll discovered that some GIS organizations did not have a GIS data access policy, while others had a rudimentary policy, but almost no organization had a formalized approach in developing such policies. that led to a project focused on data access, data distribution and permitted uses that resulted in the creation of a guide to help GIS departments to step through the thought process on developing a policy.

The guide takes into account key stakeholder personnel, different types of data, and different approaches to managing that data. Contributions to the document came from multiple organizations and levels of government including municipal, county, state, and federal agencies as well as from a utility. While the document is written with the local organization in mind, it is applicable to different levels of government and can be used as a vehicle for policy development within the private sector.

From the Overview:

In many organizations, the GIS manager has been charged with establishing GIS data access policy for the organization without the official authority to do so and without understanding the implications associated with policy implementation. Often, the result is a policy that is not formally adopted or a policy that has been established strictly from a legal perspective.

The document serves as a process framework for developing an effective GIS data access policy. GIS managers can use this framework to help decision makers understand and formulate a GIS data access policy for their entire organization. The process encourages decision makers to review options for data distribution and carefully consider how implementing a policy will impact the organization, staff, private citizens, the business community, and other government
agencies.

The goal is to enlighten and inform decision makers about specific GIS data access policy decisions. The goal is not for all government organizations to have the same policies, but for each organization to formulate policies using an informed and well thought out process.

The document outlines a series of data access policy components that should be considered during policy development. Information about the components, suggested participants, and potential implications are presented for each. Readers are encouraged to utilize these components as a framework for policy development and to expand the content as needed to address the specific concerns of their organization.

To help facilitate understanding and discussion, the document is written from the perspective of a non-GIS practitioner. This is the product of a collaborative effort among members of the Geospatial Administrators Association of South Carolina (GAASC).

“What Cannot be Measured…”

noreply@blogger.com (Mike Mahaffie) — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:54:00 +0000

Editor's Note: The following is a guest post from Dennis Goreham, retired GIS coordinator for Utah, and a member of the National Geospatial Advisory Committee.

The National Geospatial Advisory Committee (NGAC) has endorsed, as a concept, a paper crafted by the NGAC Governance Subcommittee which seeks to promote the development of a National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI) by creating a more precise definition of the NSDI and of a set of metrics needed to measure progress towards the NSDI.

The paper – a Proposal to Measure Progress Toward Realizing the NSDI Vision (PDF) – takes as its central theme the truism that “what cannot be measured, cannot be managed.” It was presented at the December NGAC meeting and resulted in instruction that the Subcommittee begin implementation, including outreach to refine the metrics approach.

The initial categories of metrics selected by the committee address many aspects of the NSDI beyond its original data-centric definition:

Societal metrics intended to determine the extent to which geospatial data, processing and applications have become part of the general information infrastructure and decision support process;
Environmental measures which describe the full extent of geospatial activities and their economic implications;
Data metrics providing evidence of progress toward the initial completion or the ongoing maintenance of framework data layers at a minimum;
Technology metrics for the fitness and quality of the underlying technology infrastructure in use across relevant organizations; and
Governance metrics to measure progress toward the realization of a national governance structure for the NSDI.

Readers should note that the proposed measures are national in scope, and not merely federal. There are many opportunities, even responsibilities, for the states and for NSGIC to participate in measuring, analyzing, and communicating metrics that will help manage the NSDI.

Virginia Approves a GIS Strategic Plan

noreply@blogger.com (Mike Mahaffie) — Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:27:00 +0000

The Virginia Geographic Information Network (VGIN) Advisory Board has approved a 2010-1015 GIS Strategic Plan (PDF).

The plan, developed under a grant from the FGDC as part of the 50 States Initiative, was approved at the January 6 meeting of the Advisory Board.

The plan includes a snapshot of the current state of GIS in Virginia, a shared vision for where the GIS community wants to go, strategic goals and next steps to take them there.

Information taken from the GISVirginia blog.

Maryland Governor Establishes "Maryland iMap"

noreply@blogger.com (Mike Mahaffie) — Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:28:00 +0000

On December 18, 2009, Maryland Governor Martin O'Malley signed an Executive Order entitled "One Maryland - One Map; Maryland Integrated Map (MD iMap)" (PDF) that establishes an organizational structure to guide and coordinate inter-agency and intergovernmental efforts to share geospatial data and tools in Maryland.

The order identifies and defines the role of an Executive Committee, including the Secretaries of all the state's cabinet agencies, and formally identifies and defines the role of the State Geographic Information Officer (GIO) as well as that of the Technical Committee.

(NSGIC's own) Kenny Miller, who has been filling the role for all practical purposes for some time, is the designated GIO and will move later this year from his long-term home in Maryland's Department of Natural Resources to the Department of Information Technology.

The executive order is focused on the creation of a "Maryland Integrated Map (MD iMap), which will serve as a statewide basemap and help state agencies to "better implement and coordinate policies across the State."

"The execution of the Executive Order has been a long time in coming and reflects the value of laying the foundation over the years to prepare for this eventuality. It also reflects the rapid increase in interest at the highest levels of State government in providing Marylanders with information of how their government allocates funds and where those funds are spent" reflects Kenny Miller, who becomes the State's first-ever GIO.

"The Maryland State Geographic Information Committee (MSGIC) began in the early 1990's to grow GIS technology and foster collaboration and communication to among the various partners. It wasn't until the O'Malley-Brown Administration began, in early 2007, to demand agencies use GIS to both target program efforts and funds and to measure progress that the interest on formalizing the governance and official capacity of the GIO really took root. This represents a win for all those who have labored to make this day a reality."

The Governor will provide strategic direction to the Executive Committee, which will be chaired by the Secretary of Information Technology. The Director of the Governor's StateStat office will be vice-chair.

The Executive Council, which will be a "subcabinet" and will advise the Governor on all issues pertaining to the MD iMAP, will designate a Technical Committee, headed by the GIO, to oversee the day to day activities needed to create the MD iMAP.

2010 Midyear Conference Awards

git@socket.net (Tony) — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:59:00 +0000

NSGIC Service Awards

NSGIC offers four awards, all recognizing high levels of effort and success in moving the NSDI forward in ways that serve the greater community, not just the home organization of an award winner. NSGIC awards vary by nature, the number given per year, whether the effort is lifetime or focused on the previous year, the relationship of the award winner to NSGIC, and whether the award is typically given at the mid-year meeting or annual conference. No person can receive the same award twice. All awards consist of a plaque mounted on a walnut base and their names preserved on the NSGIC website.

Nominations are now open for the Distinguished Service Award and the Dedicated Service Award. Please review the attached criteria and consider making a nomination. Please send all nominations to Tony Spicci at the address listed below. Nominations will be verified for eligibility by the Awards Subcommittee. Each nominee will be individually evaluated according to the award criteria. If a nominee is selected, the award will be made at the Midyear Meeting

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Best Regards,

-- Tony Spicci

Anthony A. Spicci
Past President
Delegate to COGO
Conference Committee Chair
National States Geographic Information Council
2105 Laurel Bush Road, Suite 200 Bel Air, MD 21015
P (443) 640-1075 F (443) 640-1031
Tony.Spicci@mdc.mo.gov

http://www.nsgic.org

The Obama Administration Arrives at NGAC

noreply@blogger.com (Mike Mahaffie) — Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:00:00 +0000

The following was submitted by Barney Krucoff, the GIS Director for the District of Columbia, Secretary to NSGIC's Board, and a member of the National Geospatial Advisory Committee (NGAC).

The National Geospatial Advisory Committee (NGAC) held its first meeting in April 2008, late in the life of the Bush administration. By the fall of 2008 most of the senior Bush political appointees had left their respective agencies and the government below the cabinet level entered a period in which many key positions were not filled. In such an environment, career employees are well able to keep the government running, but significant operational change is unlikely occur.

The December 2009 NGAC meeting was notable for the energy and direction provided by the Obama administration. Derek Douglas, Executive Office of the President, Xavier de Souza Briggs, Office of Management and Budget, and Andrew Jackson, Department of the Interior, each spoke to the committee. Another administration official, Vivek Kundra, had previously spoken to NGAC (PDF). Each has a very important job to do and must move with extraordinary speed.

Their priorities include:

Developing resilient communities
Developing effective place-based policies
Making the government more transparent
Ensuring that the Department of the Interior operates efficiently and shares its information

Geospatial data and technology is not on the priority list, but underlies each of these goals. The amount of high-level attention that geospatial will get depends on our communities' ability to quickly mobilize and meet the needs of an administration that is hungry for the data and analysis. In this light, the administration’s budget guidance, which calls of FGDC/Geospatial Line of Business to, “by April 1 … to provide recommendations to revise its governance structure, a 2012 business case and budget request for imagery for the nation and a modernization plan, including a target architecture of the geospatial platform” is perhaps the first and last opportunity to capture the imagination of the Obama administration by helping them do better what they are going to do with or without us.

Also notable from the December NGAC meeting: a serious push from USGS on LiDAR that leverages many of the “For The Nation” principles.

An Idea to Improve Data.Gov

noreply@blogger.com (Mike Mahaffie) — Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:55:00 +0000

NSGIC has registered an idea on the Federal CIO Council's Evolving Data.gov web site. The site was developed as part of the CIO Council's effort to involve the public in the evolution and growth of data.gov.

NSGIC leadership gathered via Google Wave to discuss data.gov and how it might help with NSGIC's effort to support a National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI). Out of those talks grew an idea:

Data.gov should become a nationally managed "access point" that provides a mechanism for all levels of government to participate or integrate with, thus creating a single location for citizens to access government data.

This idea matches NSGIC's vision for the NSDI; a nationwide collection of geospatial data that originates in local, county and state agencies and is aggregated up to the national level. It is an approach that counts on a national effort to develop and promote data standards and to manage the integration of data from all levels of government.

"Nearly 30 of us tossed around a number of ideas and ultimately chose this as NSGIC's official submission," explained NSGIC President Will Craig (Minnesota). "I will ask the full membership to consider this idea within the context of the Evolving Data.Gov site. I hope to see other ideas submitted by NSGIC members as well."

A Field Guide to GIS for Non-GIS Folks

noreply@blogger.com (Mike Mahaffie) — Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:39:00 +0000

The NGO mapping organization MapAction earlier this year published a Field Guide to Humanitarian Mapping (PDF) that sets out to provide "a comprehensive manual to selecting and using free and open source GIS and other software for humanitarian operations."

MapAction, based in the UK, describes itself as "the only non-governmental organisation (NGO) with a substantial track record in field mapping for disaster emergencies." It explains its purpose this way:

Before an aid agency can respond to a disaster, their first need is for...information. Where are the affected people? Where are the relief resources? Who is doing what already?

MapAction delivers that vital information in the form of maps, created from information gathered at the disaster scene. By conveying a 'shared operational picture', our maps play a crucial role in delivering humanitarian aid to the right place, quickly.

The Field Guide to Humanitarian Mapping includes basic introductions to GIS mapping and to the use of GPS to collect data. It also offers detailed tutorials on using free and/or open source tools such as Google Earth and MapWindow to create and manage GIS data and maps for humanitarian response efforts.

California CIO's Office Gets a Geocoding Grant

noreply@blogger.com (Mike Mahaffie) — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:31:00 +0000

California GIO (and NSGIC Board Member) Michael Byrne has announced that his state's Emergency Management Agency has awarded the Office of the State Chief Information Officer a $1 million dollar grant to develop an enterprise geocoding service.

Mr. Bryne announced the grant award on California's The Tech Blog, calling it "another milestone in geospatial information for California." He notes that the grant will not only bring all state emergency response comand centers to a common operating picture for the state, but will also help save money for the state:

By setting up a comprehensive enterprise service, we ensure all state agencies which maintain address data will be able to use this service. Having these agencies use this single comprehensive service means for the first time there will be a common understanding of mapping addresses in the state. We will ensure that addresses in every state agency are mapped with the same standards and methods providing a common approach and bridging the cap of our state silos.