When it comes to the use and abuse of acronyms, NSGIC takes a backseat to no one. Recognizing that not everybody, particularly new members and new attendees to our conferences, will understand all of the acronyms flying around, the Membership Services Committee has created a glossary for members and conference attendees to use. Simply go to the website and use a find command to learn what that acronym meant. The glossary will be updated as needed, particularly prior to the two annual conferences.
If you have been to any NSGIC meeting, or have read the April 13th post on the National Address Database Summit meeting in Linthicum, Maryland, you will know that realizing the development of a publicly accessible National Address Point Database (NAPD) with X and Y coordinates, is a very high priority for the National States Geographic Information Council (NSGIC) and many others. Nearly all government service delivery requires a NAPD, and creating one will significantly reduce government duplication of effort and waste.
The final report from the National Address Database Summit meeting is now available at this link. You can also find more information on the Summit Meeting, including the presentations, at this link. NSGIC appreciates the efforts of the U.S. Department of Transportation to host this meeting and work on this important initiative.
Jim Lacy (Wisconsin) has posted a couple of videos to YouTube concerning the National High Altitude Photography Program (NHAP) partnership program. These videos, shown at a recent National Digital Orthoimagery Program (NDOP) meeting, help the viewer to understand the importance of coordination and partnerships to develop consistent, reliable and standardized imagery across the conterminous United States for the benefit of all common uses, needs and data collection.
Thanks to Mike Vanhook, NSGIC Membership Services co-chair for setting up a NSGIC YouTube channel, one more effort to provide everyone with a richer membership experience.
This article describes the challenges of getting notices out to the right people in the right places at the right time about dangerous conditions in their area.
I heard this piece on NPR and thought it was pretty darn cool! They’re collecting crowd-sourced images and photogrammetry techniques to re-create sites and artifacts destroyed in the Middle East.
On Thursday May 21st, 2015 I attended the first-ever “Mapathon” event hosted by the White House (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHQh68bXDqg ). Not only was it a tremendous honor to represent NSGIC, it was a personal experience I will not soon forget. The event took place in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House grounds. In attendance were a variety of federal agencies, non-profit groups, some international representatives and a very small number of for-profit companies.
The goal of the event was to “…celebrate and actively participate in Open Mapping.” Open mapping is sometimes referred to as crowd mapping or crowdsourced mapping. The White House invite I received stated, “…geospatial data has been a key component of the Administration’s Open Data initiatives” and promoted the Map Give project (http://mapgive.state.gov/why-map/ ) as a starting point for presentations and discussion. There has been tremendous success in open mapping efforts during and after disasters, which is one reason the White House is keen on promoting it. Examples of successful crowd mapping are the Haiti earthquake in 2010, Ebola outbreaks in West Africa, Philippines, and Nepal disasters.
The White House held the event to raise awareness of open mapping in the United States, and to grow the number of volunteer mappers. Attendees had the opportunity to engage in one of three mapping activities. Mapgive, Power Service Area Mapping (a program under development by the Dept. of Energy), and Every Kid in a Park (an initiative that will improve facility information on public lands that have educational activities for kids) were three project areas in which attendees could participate.
I commend the White House for bringing attention to open mapping and the benefits that collaborative crowd mapping provides. Having a spotlight on the subject certainly raises the conversation significantly. Open mapping has many positives and why it is attracting a lot of attention, but it does have some drawbacks. For example, it would be difficult to crowd map cadastral (property ownership) or elevation data.
Increasingly, GIS coordinators and professionals are facing real questions about the benefit and limitations of open mapping. NSGIC must understand these issues and how authoritative government datasets (e.g. address points, cadastral) can co-exist with open mapping initiatives. This fall during our annual conference in Kansas City (http://www.nsgic.org/2015-nsgic-annual-conference ) I expect some significant discussions to take place on open mapping. I’m inviting you all to attend and engage in that discussion.
Chris Diller – WI, NSGIC President-Elect
The PEW Center for Research published an excellent study last month that analyzed public attitudes around Open Data. It’s an excellent report and you can glean the highlights from the Executive Summary at the beginning.
If you believe, as I do, that Open Data is a very important movement for us to align with and pay attention to as Geospatial Professionals, it will be clear from this report that there is a pretty considerable gap that needs to be closed. Awareness of open data and its benefits is low.
Another good example of benefits to citizens gained through the use of GIS:
A developer created an app that sends location info directly to your local dispatch – I want to find out more about it!
Long Beach worked with Code For America to develop this app that helps to identify addresses from which 911 calls are most frequently made, making response more efficient and targeted. They indicate interest in being used in other cities.
This is a very interesting article that describes an excellent idea to make older technology more useful and interoperable with new tech.
Jon Gottsegen, Kathy Demarco, Phil Worrall, Iain Hyde (Guest Speaker), Susan Fox, Miki Schmidt, Krysia Sepita, Mariam Pomilio, Leland Pierce, Jim Scott, Nathan Lowry, Pat Cummens, Richard Betgereit, Zsolt Nagy.
Iain Hyde, Deputy Chief Recovery Officer, State of Colorado Governor’s Office
In 2013 Colorado was hit by the most catastrophic flooding since 1976. Flood event estimated at nearly $4 billion dollar impact of this event. Immediately after this event a resiliency workgroup was formed. First year was mostly focused on recovering from the flood events, but also how to build back better, stronger and to become more resilient, and this is our current focus of our Colorado resiliency project.
The resiliency workgroup is working toward formalizing and developing a Colorado Resiliency Framework. Colorado Resiliency Framework is currently under development March – May, 2015. Why?
- Colorado has experienced four major presidential declared disasters in the last 5 years, but even more [smaller non-declared] disaster events impacted local communities during the same time period.
- We anticipate more frequent events in the future due to changing climate patterns.
For recovery and current resiliency efforts from:
- Federal Disaster Funds from declared flood disaster (320 million)
We hope to fund ongoing resiliency efforts through:
- Creating a Community Resiliency Partnership Fund
- HUD Resiliency Grant Competition award
- Sweat equity (We will proceed with this effort statewide regardless of competition / grant awards)
How do we define vulnerability and resiliency? What are the different sectors in a community (Economic, Government, Community, Housing, Social, Infrastructure, etc…), and what resiliency actually means to each sector, how do we respond, and how do we prioritize these? (See slides)
This summer the plan is to:
- Use the framework to pilot the development of Local Resiliency Strategies
- Develop a GIS-based Risk and vulnerability assessment tool
- Start building a stable funding source. The Community Resiliency Partnership Fund (Existing disaster funds and potential HUD grant competition funds to seed this fund, but also build out permanent funding by building local and private funding partnerships.)
For More Information:
- Colorado’s web site: www.coloradounited.com/resilient The Resiliency Framework report to be released next week for public comment.
- Presentation Slides – Iain Hyde NSGIC Presentation
- Recording – https://nsgic.webex.com/nsgic/lsr.php?RCID=0550760f037240c79bb8a01559822bc4
Resiliency Task Force (News and Announcement):
- Zsolt Nagy, AECOM
- Would be interested in knowing more how this work in Colorado is it being informed from a national /international resiliency efforts.
- UN has just released a scorecard on resilient cities, co-developed by AECOM and IBM. This could be of interest to NSGIC members on how scoring can be used to evaluate Counties and States.*
- Miki Schmidt, NOAA
- National Sea Grant Resilient competition.** FY15 budget included a $5 million resilience coastal grant opportunity [coastal watersheds in 34 states]. Is currently delayed, but hope to be able to spend in near future.
- NSGIC should consider playing a role in putting together a geospatial data sharing plan for local, statewide and regional resiliency applications. Tim DeTroy presented recently on lessons learned from Sandy in his state – this could be a good source to start with.
- States and NSGIC would definitely be in a good position to support these grant proposals by distilling down a short list of minimum essential GIS data sets.
- This could help kick start the work of this task force.
- Have talked to Bill Burgess about this grant and can follow up with him more.
- Jon Gottsegen, Co GIO
NSGIC could define the common Geospatial data, technology and resource threads between these different initiatives:
- HUD Resiliency Grant Competition
- Climate Data Initiative
- 100 Resilient Cities Competition
- National Sea Grant Competition
- 3DEP LiDAR program funds
- Pat Cummens, Esri
- There are a number of organizations like IMCA, National League of Cities, the Urban Sustainability Network, with substantial resiliency activities under way. We do not need to reinvent the wheel, but partner with these other groups
- Esri whiteboard discussions with customers on resiliency #1 is flooding, but #2 is Extreme Heat events
- Recommend states [NSGIC] put together a list of “must have / minimum essential” geospatial data to support resiliency.
- Esri is putting together another Resiliency App. Challenge on “Climate and Public Health” to support the President’s Climate Data Initiative. These are open sourced and publically available through hacker league site and Esri site.***
Footnotes & References:
*From Zsolt Nagy, AECOM: UN Score Card. UNISDR – 10 point checklist –
View Score Card: UNScorecard-1pager
**From Susan Fox, NOAA: The Sea Grant resilience index that we mentioned today was developed through the MS-AL Sea Grant Consortium. This is something that we highlight during our trainings, such as the Coastal Community Planning and Development training.
MS-AL Sea Grant’s Coastal Resilience Index: http://masgc.org/assets/uploads/publications/662/coastal_community_resilience_index.pdf
General info here: http://masgc.org/coastal-storms-program/resilience-index
There is also a grant program with project descriptions.
***From Pat Cummens, Esri: Some links we talked about below
Rockefeller 100 resilient communities http://downloads.esri.com/agol/pub/resilientcities/index.html
Minneapolis resilience story map – be sure to drive into to data on the extreme heat event one: http://cityoflakes.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapTour/index.html?appid=ef216fd128dc44cdbe7bc17c2ec06668&webmap=c6433f1f2346487fb0331c91b64bfbca
Esri Resilient Communities: http://www.esri.com/industries/government/resilient-communities
Jon Gottsegen, CO GIO: This is a link to the Community Inclusion mapping site that came up in Iain’s presentation today: http://coloradosilc.org/resources/community-inclusion-in-colorado-aka-mapping-project/
– END OF TASK FORCE MEETING NOTES –
This is an intriguing quiz…I got 7/7.
The image in the article says it all:
Realizing the development of a publicly accessible National Address Point Database (NAPD) with X and Y coordinates, is a very high priority for the National States Geographic Information Council (NSGIC) and many others. Nearly all government service delivery requires a NAPD, and creating one will significantly reduce government duplication of effort and waste.
We saw the beginning of the process at the National Address Database Summit that was held last week at the Maritime Institute facilities in Linthicum, Maryland. It was sponsored by the USDOT with input from the U.S. Census Bureau during the planning stages. Participants from every sector were invited to attend this event and to engage in the facilitated discussions designed to identify the business case; governance and partnership issues; outreach and communication; and the technology that will be required to effectively develop and maintain a NAPD. Facilitation was provided by a team of expert facilitators provided by Applied Geographics and the Lead Alliance. They will also be drafting reports to detail the outcomes of the discussions.
The composition of the attendees was critical to the success of this meeting, because it represented the range of stakeholders that must be at the table. In addition to the 25 observers to the process, there were 10 Federal, 16 state, 17 local, and 2 tribal government representatives. They were joined by 8 private companies and 5 nonprofit/trade organizations that all have a vested interest in the development of a NAPD.
The event started with welcoming comments from Steve Lewis (USDOT GIO), Richard McKinney (USDOT CIO), Rolf Schmitt (Dep. Director, USDOT Bureau of Transportation Statistics), and Ivan Deloatch (Staff Director, FGDC). They each provided their thoughts on the value of a NAPD and the status of current efforts, ranging from the state of the current bureaucracy, to the highly personal experience of McKinney who, as a young man had to walk out into a foggy night to flag down a lost ambulance responding to his father’s heart attack. McKinney’s level of commitment was clearly demonstrated when he said that “if the participants of the Summit can figure out the identified issues, he would use the authority of his office to make it happen.”
Before the breakout sessions began, the participants were exposed to many of the diverse business requirements for a NAPD ranging from the reporting requirements for mortgage banks, to the services provided by the public safety answering points (PSAPs or 9-1-1 Call Centers) that send police, fire and ambulance crews to your front door as quickly as possible. The messages were clear. We all need a National Address Point Database to sustain business requirements and to ensure the safety of our loved ones.
It was noted that the end goal is clearly achievable, because it has already been accomplished in the United Kingdom and Denmark. Open Addresses was cited as a successful example, while noting that it may not be a sustainable model and that government must provide the appropriate leadership. We also know that several state address programs are in-place to coordinate the development of statewide address point databases.
Now we must come together to sustain this effort, and then finish the job in the U.S. Based on initial reports from the participants, we are well underway. The draft report from the Summit is expected by May 8th. The organizers of this event will provide their comments and the report will be finalized ten days later.