Flood Mapping Reform Discussed on Capitol Hill
Representatives from several groups interested in FEMA's map modernization efforts were in Washington this week to testify at the Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity Hearing on The Flood Insurance Reform and Modernization Act of 2007 (H.R. 1682).
A key part of the discussion was the effort to modernize FEMA flood maps.
Witnesses included representatives from:
The representative of the floodplain managers supported greater use of digital data and GIS data and tools, but suggested that, given limited resources, engineering studies of flood risk based on existing data are more important in the short term than expanded acquisition of new, higher-resolution digital elevation data.
There was support for re-establishing the Technical Mapping Advisory Council (TMAC), but concern that it be given broad representation and sufficient authority to be effective.
The MAPPS testimony also included a suggestion that FEMA be given access to the Census Bureau's Master Address File (MAF). This could be a contentious idea; Census has a tradition, and a legislative mandate, to guard that file closely because of privacy concerns.
The listing of hearing witnesses includes links to the written testimony submitted by each witness. It will eventually also include a hearing transcript.
A key part of the discussion was the effort to modernize FEMA flood maps.
Witnesses included representatives from:
- The Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM)
- The Management Association for Private Photogrammetric Surveyors (MAPPS)
- The American Congress on Surveying and Mapping (ACSM)
- The Property Casualty Insurers Association of America
- The Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of America
- The National Association of Realtors
The representative of the floodplain managers supported greater use of digital data and GIS data and tools, but suggested that, given limited resources, engineering studies of flood risk based on existing data are more important in the short term than expanded acquisition of new, higher-resolution digital elevation data.
There was support for re-establishing the Technical Mapping Advisory Council (TMAC), but concern that it be given broad representation and sufficient authority to be effective.
The MAPPS testimony also included a suggestion that FEMA be given access to the Census Bureau's Master Address File (MAF). This could be a contentious idea; Census has a tradition, and a legislative mandate, to guard that file closely because of privacy concerns.
The listing of hearing witnesses includes links to the written testimony submitted by each witness. It will eventually also include a hearing transcript.
Labels: acsm, fema, floodmapping, legislation, MAPPS




3 Comments:
This comment is just a test.
It seems to me that doing lidar before IFTN would be a better technical approach. Also see below, quoting from another email:
Yesterday, Dave Maune testified before a House subcommittee in reference to a FEMA flood insurance bill. In his testimony he advocated strongly for Lidar for the Nation, based on the NRC report. His testimony also mentions the February national lidar initiative meeting hosted by USGS in Reston. He also makes a strong case for a coordinated federal effort for national lidar, rather than individual agencies seeking funding separately. The text of Dave's testimony is found at:
http://www.house.gov/apps/list/hearing/financialsvcs_dem/htmaune061207.pdf
The MAPPS press release which summarizes the testimony can be found at:
http://www.gisuser.com/content/view/11859/
This post has been removed by the author.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home