This guide [HERE] provides common sense steps families can take to prepare for natural disasters as well as understanding the risks where you live.
We should ask them to come to one of conferences and let us play with this. Imagine what classrooms could so with this technology!
The National States Geographic Information Council (NSGIC) Board of Directors unanimously endorsed recent guidelines produced by the Management Association for Private Photogrammetric Surveyors (MAPPS). The guidelines outline best practices for citizen privacy and geospatial data. The MAPPS guidelines, adopted by their organization in July, are designed to provide a self-regulatory framework for its collection of private firms engaged in geospatial technologies and data. They are intended to provide guidance on when companies should seek individual consent for gathering geospatial data and when such data are not breaching privacy concerns and will serve public good. It addresses such issues as geospatial data derived from aerial imagery and drawing the line at not collecting real-time, personally identifiable data.
The NSGIC endorsed the common-sense guidelines during their August Board meeting. NSGIC President Shelby Johnson is quoted as saying, “I’m very proud that our board acted in unison on this endorsement. We totally agree with MAPPS on this issue, and it’s very important for the industry as a whole and those of us in government to be on the same page.” This builds on NSGIC’s existing policy about what data should be considered private and what isn’t. State Geographic Information System (GIS) coordinating councils have recognized the complexity of the issue surrounding privacy for citizens. At the same time, enormous societal benefits can be gained by leveraging GIS technologies and data. The MAPPS guidelines are straightforward and should be applied equally across the private and public sectors.
This white paper reports on the emergency and disaster management community response and recovery lessons learned in the years since Hurricane Katrina. Overall this is a good report and an interesting read, but unfortunately the role that geospatial data and technology played in this process is lost in this report. The value of maps and mapping is clearly indicated, but the reports misuses the acronym GPS, and also incorrectly defines GIS as Global Information Systems when discussing mapping, so that the underlying geospatial technology being used is not clear.
There are a number of really good practical recommendations in this report. Natural disasters like hurricane Katrina will happen again, but from the lessons learned the goal is to make sure that an inadequate response does not. The top four takeaways from the report are all about resilience, and include a call to embrace preparedness, create resilient communities, implement lessons learned, and dedicate funding to create resilient systems and communities that will endure disaster more effectively, facilitating a more rapid and complete response and recovery.
To download the report click HERE.
On Monday this week the NSGIC Board of Directors approved the 2015 -17 Strategic Goals. The development of the strategic goals is the result of many hours of discussion and interaction by leadership. It all began in February with a member survey and a planning retreat as part of the mid-year meeting in Annapolis. I can say these goals truly reflect the pulse of the membership and I thank all who participated and provided feedback to the survey.
There are a few items to point out about the strategic goals. You will notice that the core vision and mission of NSGIC has not changed. The Geospatial Maturity Assessment, the GIS Inventory and advocating for the National Geospatial Data Act remain atop of the list of our priorities. You will also notice that the document has been streamlined considerably to four pages. As a result, the document itself should be easier to read and understand.
The last item I will point out is the focus on building more support for member participation. Leadership heard “loud and clear” the need to grow our member base and provide increased opportunities for current members to participate, so that is what we’ve done. Goal 3 is heavily focused on improving member growth and participation.
The NSGIC Strategic Goals can be found at the following link. http://www.nsgic.org/public_resources/NSGIC_Strategic_Goals_2015-2017_Approved.pdf
Chris Diller, President-Elect
When it comes to the use and abuse of acronyms, NSGIC takes a backseat to no one. Recognizing that not everybody, particularly new members and new attendees to our conferences, will understand all of the acronyms flying around, the Membership Services Committee has created a glossary for members and conference attendees to use. Simply go to the website and use a find command to learn what that acronym meant. The glossary will be updated as needed, particularly prior to the two annual conferences.
If you have been to any NSGIC meeting, or have read the April 13th post on the National Address Database Summit meeting in Linthicum, Maryland, you will know that realizing the development of a publicly accessible National Address Point Database (NAPD) with X and Y coordinates, is a very high priority for the National States Geographic Information Council (NSGIC) and many others. Nearly all government service delivery requires a NAPD, and creating one will significantly reduce government duplication of effort and waste.
The final report from the National Address Database Summit meeting is now available at this link. You can also find more information on the Summit Meeting, including the presentations, at this link. NSGIC appreciates the efforts of the U.S. Department of Transportation to host this meeting and work on this important initiative.
Jim Lacy (Wisconsin) has posted a couple of videos to YouTube concerning the National High Altitude Photography Program (NHAP) partnership program. These videos, shown at a recent National Digital Orthoimagery Program (NDOP) meeting, help the viewer to understand the importance of coordination and partnerships to develop consistent, reliable and standardized imagery across the conterminous United States for the benefit of all common uses, needs and data collection.
Thanks to Mike Vanhook, NSGIC Membership Services co-chair for setting up a NSGIC YouTube channel, one more effort to provide everyone with a richer membership experience.
This article describes the challenges of getting notices out to the right people in the right places at the right time about dangerous conditions in their area.
I heard this piece on NPR and thought it was pretty darn cool! They’re collecting crowd-sourced images and photogrammetry techniques to re-create sites and artifacts destroyed in the Middle East.
On Thursday May 21st, 2015 I attended the first-ever “Mapathon” event hosted by the White House (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHQh68bXDqg ). Not only was it a tremendous honor to represent NSGIC, it was a personal experience I will not soon forget. The event took place in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House grounds. In attendance were a variety of federal agencies, non-profit groups, some international representatives and a very small number of for-profit companies.
The goal of the event was to “…celebrate and actively participate in Open Mapping.” Open mapping is sometimes referred to as crowd mapping or crowdsourced mapping. The White House invite I received stated, “…geospatial data has been a key component of the Administration’s Open Data initiatives” and promoted the Map Give project (http://mapgive.state.gov/why-map/ ) as a starting point for presentations and discussion. There has been tremendous success in open mapping efforts during and after disasters, which is one reason the White House is keen on promoting it. Examples of successful crowd mapping are the Haiti earthquake in 2010, Ebola outbreaks in West Africa, Philippines, and Nepal disasters.
The White House held the event to raise awareness of open mapping in the United States, and to grow the number of volunteer mappers. Attendees had the opportunity to engage in one of three mapping activities. Mapgive, Power Service Area Mapping (a program under development by the Dept. of Energy), and Every Kid in a Park (an initiative that will improve facility information on public lands that have educational activities for kids) were three project areas in which attendees could participate.
I commend the White House for bringing attention to open mapping and the benefits that collaborative crowd mapping provides. Having a spotlight on the subject certainly raises the conversation significantly. Open mapping has many positives and why it is attracting a lot of attention, but it does have some drawbacks. For example, it would be difficult to crowd map cadastral (property ownership) or elevation data.
Increasingly, GIS coordinators and professionals are facing real questions about the benefit and limitations of open mapping. NSGIC must understand these issues and how authoritative government datasets (e.g. address points, cadastral) can co-exist with open mapping initiatives. This fall during our annual conference in Kansas City (http://www.nsgic.org/2015-nsgic-annual-conference ) I expect some significant discussions to take place on open mapping. I’m inviting you all to attend and engage in that discussion.
Chris Diller – WI, NSGIC President-Elect
The PEW Center for Research published an excellent study last month that analyzed public attitudes around Open Data. It’s an excellent report and you can glean the highlights from the Executive Summary at the beginning.
If you believe, as I do, that Open Data is a very important movement for us to align with and pay attention to as Geospatial Professionals, it will be clear from this report that there is a pretty considerable gap that needs to be closed. Awareness of open data and its benefits is low.
Another good example of benefits to citizens gained through the use of GIS:
A developer created an app that sends location info directly to your local dispatch – I want to find out more about it!
Long Beach worked with Code For America to develop this app that helps to identify addresses from which 911 calls are most frequently made, making response more efficient and targeted. They indicate interest in being used in other cities.